Moneytalk, April 26, 2009, Bob Brinker said: "We've remained in the market. I did not make a call to get out of the market."
How much money did Bob Brinker's subscribers lose if they followed his advice to remain fully invested in his Marketimer Model Portfolios from the stock market high to the stock market low? If they had the courage to look at their statements, this is what they saw:
Bob Brinker's Model Portfolio I:
Value on October 1, 2007 = $302,561; Value on March 1, 2009 = $143,938
Bob Brinker's Model Portfolio II:
Value on October 1, 2007 = $241,994; Value on March 1, 2009 = $119,105
Model Portfolio III (more than 50% bonds):
Value on October 1, 2007 = $219,263; Value on March 1, 2009 = $147,013
Brinker pronounced several market bottoms in 2008 that were speedily taken out as the market continued to decline.
In January, 2009 when the S&P was @ 931 (just two months before the market bottomed at 677), Brinker predicted that the November low would be the market bottom -- in the 750 to 850 range.
In the February 4, 2009 Marketimer (S&P @825.88), referring to NEW money, Brinker said: “….purchase in the low-to-mid 800’s”
In the March 5, 2009, Marketimer (S&P @ 696.33), Bob Brinker said: “Due to the fact that the November 20, 2008 S&P 500 Index closing low failed to hold during the testing process, we believe a new bottoming process will be necessary for a sustainable market advance, we need to see a sequence of events consisting of (a) the establishment of an initial closing low; (b) a short-term rally; (c) a test of the area of the initial closing low on reduced selling pressure."
So there you have proof that just 4 days before the ACTUAL market bottom, Brinker published that he believed a new "bottoming process" would be necessary and he even laid out the "process," which of course, never happened.
Moneytalk, April 26, 2009, Bob Brinker said that he was "on record" recommending "buy on weakness," and he added that he had written that advice in his April Marketimer. That is correct. In March, he was looking for a new bear market bottom, yet Brinker inferred that this had been his unchanging advice for quite some time: "Well our recommendation to our subscribers has been to be a buyer on weakness. We have regarded the market as a buy on weakness. That is our view and that's certainly a view that has not changed in recent weeks."
Is that playing fast and loose with the truth? I report, you decide from the March Marketimer quote just above.
As of today, the S&P has risen about 28% since the March low. Where was the weakness?
SJ Al sent these pictures that he took at the Pensacola Naval Air Museum:
.




Based on the lack of comments, there must not have been much interest in Moneytalk or should I call it Cartalk. I will comment on some of the callers.
1. A lady called and complained that she went into a dealership and knew what model of car she wanted to buy and what she was willing to pay. The sales person wanted her to finance her purchase so he could make more money. The lady wound up walking out. She should have done what my brother did the last time a car salesman pulled this type of thing with him. He said in a loud voice: "What can I do to get YOU to sell me this car Today". The other potential customers in the showroom roared with laughter.
2. Another caller talked about how well GM was selling its cars in China. Last Friday I talked to an auditor who recently did some work in China. He said the economy was improving there and it looked like their stimulus package was working. GM is successful and profitable in China. I said I heard that the most popular car there was Buick. He said it was the Lucerne and the one they produced in China was nicer than the one they make here. He said he would like to buy one of their models. He noted that the Chinese economy was a cash economy and only the very rich have a credit card. When a car is sold it is paid for before it leaves the show room.
3. Some callers said they would buy American while others said they would not because of quality issues. One caller even said he would switch from GM to Ford because they didn't take money from the government. Another caller said he was a conservative and wouldn't buy an American car because the UAW contributed heavily to the Democratic party. One caller even suggested we put a tax on all foreign manufacturers including cars they assemble in this country. It all reminded me of the time I was driving home a few years back. The car in front of me was a Chrysler. It had a UAW bumper sticker on one side and the other side said Buy American and it bashed foreign made cars. I was driving a Jaguar at the time. I had to laugh at this ignorant fool. He was driving a care made in America but the company he worked for was owned by a German company. I OTOH was driving a car manufacture in England that was owned by the Ford motor company an American corporation.
June 1, 2009 11:17 AM [Posted here]