Search Bob Brinker Blogs

Sunday, May 1, 2011

May 1, 2011, Bob Brinker's Moneytalk: Summary, Excerpts and Commentary

May 1, 2011....Bob Brinker hosted Moneytalk today. Bob Brinker comments summarized, paraphrased or excerpted:

STOCK MARKET: Bob Brinker
reported that the Dow Jones Industrial Average traded at the 2011 high of 12,810 on Friday's close.....S&P 500 at 2011 high of 1363.63 -- total return of 9% year-to-date, including dividends.

Brinker said:
"If you go back over the past couple of decades, the annual total return on the S&P 500 is very close to 10%, which by the way, is a pretty outstanding return when you look at the world we are in today and the interest rates.....As you know, we've had a couple of great years here, 2009 was an extraordinary year and 2010 was a very good year. And now 2011, with 4 months in the books, has a 9% rate of return. So it's off to a very good start. Nasdaq Index doing alright itself, 2873. The Nasdaq 100, which is the basis for the triple-Q ETF stock price, 2404.....Of course, the bear stories have been out there. The people with their bearish forecasts have been out there this year. So far, what they're left with, at least as we complete the month of April, they're left with the 2011 stock market highs on the close on Friday."

Honey EC:
It's obvious why Brinker chose a "couple of decades" instead of one decade. The S&P 500 closed at 1249.46 on April 30, 2001. So as of Friday, the S&P was a whoppin' 114 points higher than it was ten years ago. And it has been as low as 677 in March, 2009.

INTEREST RATES AND MONETARY POLICY...Brinker said:
"Interest rates still playing the old Chubby Checker limbo rock game, 'how low can you go.' Three-month Treasuries Bills now 4 basis points annual. So that means that if you had a Treasury Bill for 4 consecutive periods at this rate, you would earn 1/25 of 1%. That's about as close to zero as you are going to get on Treasury Bills. They don't get down here very often. They are being held down by Federal Reserve monetary policy which remains accommodative.....Doing everything it can to encourage jobs growth."

Thirteen week Treasury Bill Chart


UNEMPLOYMENT RATE:
Brinker reported that unemployment has been gradually improving and that he hopes that will continue. The highest rate was a little over 10% during the recession, but right now, it is 8.8%. There will be a new jobs report on Friday, May 6th.

INFLATION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH....Brinker said:
"Rates have come back down again with concern about austerity in Washington, concern the loss of government jobs which continues on a monthly basis. All of these factors are causing concern about economic growth rate which was only 1.8 annualized in the first quarter. And only 2.5% annualized over the past two quarters. If you put together quarter four of last year and quarter one of this year..... and annualized them, you will get an annual growth rate of 2.5% on Gross Domestic Product over the past six months.....Well I'll tell you what, that's not the kind of a growth rate that puts a whole lot of pressure on the economy, on interest rates or on inflation. Which is why you're looking at such incredible low core inflation numbers. Core inflation numbers right now are exceedingly low. In fact, the Personal Consumption Expenditure core is 9/10 of 1% year-over-year, and that is a very low number."

GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS....Brinker said:
"Triple-A Municipal General Obligations with ten year average maturities are yielding 3.17. That's 4.9 if you mark that up for the 35% top Federal bracket this year and next....taxable equivalent yield.....We mentioned on the broadcast, there are still 11 states that have triple-A ratings. We mentioned Georgia, Virginia and others, so not all the states have gone the way of California or Illinois or some of the others. Some of the states have been fiscally responsible and then of course, we have the others."

BRINKER'S PROPOSED SPENDING CUTS: Brinker said:
"We have to get this thing going in the right direction. We have to reform Medicare. We have to reform Social Security. I think we have to reform Medicaid. We have to take a really serious look at the Military budget. I hate to see us say that the Military budget is untouchable, but we are going to cut Pell Grants. We are going to cut education. Huh, let me tell you, the other countries that we are competing with are not cutting education. And if we cut education, the long-term effects will be negative on this country.....But they should be looking at all this other other stuff, Medicare, Medicare, Social Security, certainly the Military....To make sure that every taxpayer dollar that is spent is money that is spent for a purpose, not just because we used to do it that way, or we always did it that way, or because the lobbyists have their tentacles on the appropriations people, which they undoubtedly have for many years......... So congratulations to Ben Bernanke for observing that fiscal policy is the most important problem facing the United States."

* IF THE FED CONTRACTS THE MONEY SUPPLY THERE WILL BE A RECESSION: Caller Larry from Pennsylvania
said he is worried about the effect of increasing cost of materials and rising gasoline prices on his small manufacturing business. Brinker said: "In my opinion, if the Fed stops expanding the money supply then I can guarantee you a recession....I think they know if they contract the money supply then the economy is going to contract and unemployment is going to go up.....I think we can say with reasonable certainty, if the Federal Reserve changes policy and begins to contract the money supply the economy will go into a woeful recession and you'll see very, very high unemployment. This is what they did in the early 1930's."

* TOBACCO BONDS: Caller Morris from El Paso
commented that 30% of the homes that are purchased were paid for with cash. He said it was because of foreclosure auctions where cash has to be paid up front. Then Morris asked Brinker about the safety of state sponsored tobacco bonds. Brinker told Morris that he had no interest or recommendation on tobacco bonds. And not only that, but he blamed smoking for the "gargantuan" health care costs that are a burden to "all 300 million taxpayers" who have to fund the deficit and national debt. Brinker thinks the good news is that smoking is down because only one out of four still smoke. But the bad news is that 25% "still use these diabolical products." Brinker said: "I would be happiest to see all of the tobacco companies go bankrupt. That would be wonderful as far as I'm concerned."

* WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HIGH PRICE OF OIL: Caller Hugh from Albuquerque
wanted to know why speculators wouldn't affect the price of oil. Brinker explained that it's not black or white. There can be speculation that affects price, but it's mostly supply and demand because oil is a global commodity. The US is consuming over 80 million barrels a day and still, the government has no energy policy. West Texas Crude oil is $113 per barrel, and Brent Crude is $129 a barrel. Brinker said: "To blame it on the speculators is political poppycock."

* FEDERAL RESERVE DROPS ECONOMIC FORECAST RATE BECAUSE OF OIL PRICES: Caller Ken from Skokie
said he gets a knot in his belly when he sees gasoline prices at $4.50 a gallon. He also said he is in Brinker's portfolio III and wondered if Brinker would recommend that he move some of the stock portion of the portfolio into bonds.

Honey EC: Brinker completely ignored Ken's question about lowering his stock allocation and zeroed in on the price of oil and the Federal Reserve.


Brinker replied to Ken:
"This is something that we monitor very closely.......You are correct that the oil price reached around $147 a barrel in the summer of 2008. However, I would have to say the economy did not weather the storm well. But you have to understand that perhaps, for whatever reason, this occurred at the same time that we were in the midst of what turned into a mortgage meltdown. And once the underlying collateral on the mortgages melted down, then we had a banking crisis. And that was really not directly linked to the price of oil......We certainly had a recession, although most people blame the recession on what happened in the financial crisis.....Oil prices are very high but they are not $147 yet in West Texas Intermediate."

Honey EC:
Brinker has a guest-speaker on the program almost every Sunday to discuss "what went wrong in 2008." Will this ever end? Why is he so seemingly obsessed with this subject? Does he actually think that listeners are learning anything useful from this constant harping on the subject? What is he trying to prove?


* OIL PRICES AND THE ECONOMIC TIPPING POINT: Brinker continued:
"In terms of US economy..... Why do we value WTI crude oil prices when we talk about the US economy? The answer is that is the crude that we consume in the United States......close to $114 a barrel.....There is a price level at which it would be the tipping point for the economy. I don't think it's $114, but it has to be monitored. Right now, I want you to observe what the Federal Reserve did....They took down their estimate for growth for 2011. Right here, right now, they took it down.....They took it down to a new range which is 3.1 to 3.3%. That is quite a change.

Prior to this revision that just came out of the FOMC meeting, these guys were at 3.4 to 3.9%.....And I think the main reason they took it down is they now see that consumers have less discretionary income because they are dumping it at the filling station....(demand destruction) is already happening. Consumption of gasoline has been really strained by the rise in prices....People come up with alternatives, car pool, whatever......Here's the problem with demand destruction. Demand destruction is fine in the US, we can import less, consume less, send less money overseas to buy oil. But we have so much growth in the rapidly growing companies like India and China....More and more people are having access to vehicles....It will continue to grow....Oil is a global commodity."


Honey EC:
I was slightly shocked at Brinker's cavalier attitude that the US facing "demand destruction is fine." Is he so far removed from ordinary life in the US that he doesn't realize that this kind of "destruction" HURTS REAL PEOPLE?

* BRINKER'S GROWTH RATE PROJECTION: Brinker said:
"My central tendency has not changed, because I was below the Fed. I never believed the Fed had the right handle on this....I'm not trying to criticize Big Ben. My central tendency is around 3% within a 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 range, as we have discussed....... It was the Federal Reserves forecast that was too high in the first place that has had to come down."

* BRINKER SOLD ALL TIPS FROM MODEL PORTFOLIOS: Caller Keith from Peoria
asked Brinker if the high price of groceries would increase the rates on Inflation Protected Bonds (TIPS). Brinker said that right now, the Fed is a buyer of Treasury securities -- creating demand by putting in about 75 billion dollars a month (from QE2). This helps to keep yields down. Plus they have become very widely owned which creates demand for them. Brinker said: "Right now, I think that the base rates are too low. And that is why we have eliminated them from our model portfolios in the investment letter. We did that at the beginning of the year."

Bob Brinker's most surprising quote of the day
: "The reality is, if the Federal Reserve starts contracting the money supply, you can pretty much write the country off."

Brinker's guest-speaker was Rody Boyd "Fatal Risk: A Cautionary Tale of AIG's Corporate Suicide"

Dixiegeezer took this picture in Clearwater Beach, Florida. Please click to enlarge - it's beautiful:


Dixiegeezer just sent this picture. He confirmed with me that it is a "real deal" photo that he took. I think it's awesome!


Moneytalk on demand and to go with Bob Brinker, is available for audio/podcasting FREE at KGO810 radio for seven days after broadcast.
The program is archived in the 1-4pm time-slots.
I download and save all three hours, including the third hour guest-speaker. KGO Radio MP3 Sunday Archives

70 comments:

Honeybee said...

This was posted early this morning on a prior thread that has now been rolled off the front page:

TFB wrote to DanG:

"First of all let me commend you for taking personal responsibility and not trying to pawn your poor decisions or your oft victories on anyone else's advice. These days, real men are far and few between.

The oddest thing I have noted about Brinker's callers is when they call in they admit they are subscribers, that they listen to his show, and then they proceed to thank him while explaining how they made money by not following his advice. It is like bizarro world from Seinfled episode.

Fluffiest of greetings to you,

tfb

Honeybee said...

DanG's response to "fluffy." :)

Dan G said...

"Thanks for the kind words, Mr. Bunny!

I used to be a big Brinker fan and would crack a brewskie every Saturday and Sunday and sit out in the back yard to listen at his feet.

That got a bit old after the ridiculous Q-trade in which he cast aside all trading rules and let a small loss grow into a gargantuan one. Fortunately I had a close stop and only lost a few percent. Others were not that fortunate.

Then he blew the 2008 bear market. Once again I had the good fortune of having discovered my favorite long-term indicator, monthly MACD. It may not be perfect (nothing is), but it has not failed me so far (knock on wood).

Good luck and be a good bunny!

- Dan G


May 1, 2011 7:25 AM

Anonymous said...

Third hour guest is another author of what happened on Wall Street (AIG). When is BB going to deplete the supply of these people? His first answer to BB ran on and on, BB finally had to interrupt. It would have been a good weekend to bring back Charlie Maxwell, the oil guy.

-- Frankj

Honeybee said...

FrankJ,

It's really amazing how relentless Bob Brinker is in hammering this subject.

I'm wondering if he doesn't think by running this subject in the ground every week, listeners will subliminally become convinced that his gross blunders that year (2008) were all understandable.

And guess what? I think his is right. That is exactly what the average listener who doesn't know that as these events unfolded, and he was well aware of them, he continued to be 100% bullish on the stock market and repeatedly spouting "buy, buy, buy."

.

Anonymous said...

HB:

BB sometimes sends a caller to the head of the class, like he did today with the woman who had been a listener since '96 and wanted to know how to handle an inheritance.

But in the cyber classroom, the seats at the head of the class are already taken by you and the other old hands who have been listening to "the professor" for all these years.

Imagine sitting in a class, listening to history lecture given by a professor who leaves out, or glosses over important events.

Today's third hour guest rang the bell when he said everyone he interviewed said that the repeal of Glass-Steagal was the cause ...etc.

Not that I disagree, but right then, BB was off to the races. I didn't listen any further, did BB tell him to go to the head of the class?

-- Frankj

birdbrain said...

I concur. Enough of these guest journalists rehashing what happened during the Wall Street debacle. May I humbly offer a suggestion to Mr B for his next broadcast?

"I'd like to welcome to the program Peter Schiff and Meredith Whitney, who both predicted the financial meltdown of 2008 and tried to warn investors of the impending stock market crash. Thank you for joining us on Moneytalk."

Thanks to Frankj for the Promontory Point photos. Have always been fascinated with American western history (Lewis and Clark, Oregon Trail, Gold Rush). Hope to make it to that spot in Utah one day.

Anonymous said...

Birdbrain:

I hope you are able to go someday. My daughter and I were not on any tight schedule, so we took the side trip.

You can access this location either eastbound or westbound if traveling on I-80.

There is a driving loop you can take from the Park Service site where you can look at the railroad grades constructed by both the CP and the UP. Both companies built grade far beyond this point -- the UP toward the west and the CP toward the east. Originally, the CP was limited to 150 miles east of the CA-NV border but they hired a lobbyist, and in 1866, he got the legislation changed to allow CP to keep building until they "met or passed" the UP tracks. Congress kicked the can down the road and did not designate Promontory Point as the joining point until a few years later.

I better stop or the railroad history buffs will invade this blog and Ms. Honeybee won't be too happy. A big thank you to her for her generosity in posting these photos and narrative!

-- Frankj

Honeybee said...

FrankJ said: "I better stop or the railroad history buffs will invade this blog and Ms. Honeybee won't be too happy."

Au contraire..... I am fascinated by the subject of American history. :)

.

Kirk said...

Annualized inflation rate for last 6 months at 4.60%. Thus, iBonds will pay 4.60% for the next six months.

Current Series-I Bond rates

The CPI-U increased from 218.439 in September 2010 to 223.467 in March 2011, a six-month increase of 2.30%.

4.60% = 2 x 2.30%

Anonymous said...

IBonds will also pay a fixed rate of ZERO for the next 30 years.

Hjy

Honeybee said...

There are some bizarre things going on with the price of silver. Looks like this after-hours slam-down in price was one of opportunity for those who are short on their silver supply -- made possible by the market being closed and thinly traded for so long.

SLV and AGQ have regained much of their losses already. Here are some comments by one of my favorite silver "gurus."

This morning, Ground Zero wrote:

From: GROUND ZERO™ 1 Recommendation of 18097

i think so too, I'm not concerned at all, in fact I bought at 42.50 last night as posted here and I suspect no matter what happens to silver this week, we'll probably finish the week higher than where it is right now... it's the boys at the Comex, they're short and can't deliver the bullion they promised, their game is exposed... so, when Asia was closed and Great Britain being closed on Monday, these clowns are just taking full advantage of a very thin market to push the market lower... they even raised their margin twice within 48 hours to spook people out of their positions, what does that tell you... LOL!!!

Everyone wants a pullback so they can buy, but when the pullback comes everyone gets scared..."


Silicon Investor Buy and Sell Signals

.

Honeybee said...

hjy said: "IBonds will also pay a fixed rate of ZERO for the next 30 years."

Admittedly, I know almost nothing about how IBonds work. Could you help me understand how what you said is possible?

.

Anonymous said...

Sure, iBonds pay a fixed rate plus a variable rate tied to inflation. See kirk's link.

The fixed rate for new iBonds is zero. That is why they stink Check out the link for details.

Hjy

Honeybee said...

Well, 4.6% for six months sounds pretty good. What's your problem with it?

.

Jeffchristie said...

Andy in Redwood city called in the last hour. He talked about an effort to reinstate the Glass-Steagal Act. He claimed that some democrats supported it but NO republicans did. According to the Huffington Post John McCain was one of the sponsors of the bill. I don't know if Andy is just ignorant on this or if he is a liar with a political agenda.

"Senators John McCain and Maria Cantwell are joining forces to reinstate the Depression-era Glass-Steagal Act of 1933, which separated commercial banking from Wall Street investment banking.

The Glass-Steagall law was repealed in 1999, allowing for commercial and investment banking to combine. Bloomberg notes that its repeal has sparked debate as to whether it "helped spawn reckless lending practices and financial speculation that led to the meltdown of credit markets last year and the $700 billion U.S. bailout of troubled banks."

So far, the idea hasn't gotten any attention from the Obama administration, which does not attribute the current crisis to the law's repeal, and dismisses the idea that reinstating it would have any impact on the financial sector. Furthermore, Newsweek's Michael Hirsh points out that renewing Glass-Steagal may be "almost akin to unscrambling an egg"-- in other words, impossible."

Source Huffington post 12 15 2009

Anonymous said...

John McShame is no longer Republican!

Honeybee said...

What do you mean about John McCain no longer being a Republican. Is your intention to be funny or just insult Senator McCain?
.

Anonymous said...

John McShame is no longer Republican!

My worry is McAmnesty is the new face of the Republican party.

tfb

Honeybee said...

The thought of John McCain as "the face of the Republican Party" is HORRIFYING!

Would you like to know how I really feel about it? :)

.

Pig said...

Ms Honey says: Would you like to know how I really feel about it? :)

i thought this was a family zone?

:--)

Anonymous said...

All bubbles end badly whether it's internet stocks or silver.

Honeybee said...

Yep, but only time will tell if this is an end to a silver bubble. I'm hoping to get the courage to buy more tomorrow if it drops further.

.

Jim said...

Looks like all the silver traders read my post here late last week revealing that I had bought SLV back in March. That all that it took for them to head for the exits.

Anonymous said...

Looks like another silver trader jumped ship yesterday:

"I still think silver has lots more upside to go, but maybe not right now... it had a heck of a run for the last couple of months, I'm glad I closed it all out today"

Those leveraged holdings are not for the long term IMO.

RAR

Honeybee said...

It has nothing to do with the "leverage" aspect. It has to do with this:

"Silver prices continue to be volatile. The CME Group just raised silver futures margins by another 11.6%, which could back cut back speculative silver trading. Silver prices did go down on the news.

The US dollar is up in morning trading and crude-oil futures have fallen as a result. Traders will be watching for any signs that the dollar can stabilize or will it continue to weaken as the week goes by. This will have an effect on oil prices and the price of gold as well.


Morning Gold-Silver Market Report

.

Honeybee said...

It's not looking good for silver or gold right now. I have sold part of my positions to lock in profits.

"The same investors that turned silver red hot are now being blamed for its decline.

They are short-term traders who helped drive the nearly 30 percent parabolic price climb in silver futures in the past month, and analysts say they were behind its dramatic fall Sunday and Monday.

The sharpest slide occurred several hours before the U.S. announced the killing of Osama Bin Laden, with silver futures plunging more than 10% to just over $42 an ounce in the first few minutes of the electronic session Sunday night.

Silver prices are falling again this afternoon, trading below $44 an ounce in electronic trading, on news of further margin increases.

The CME Group [CME 295.52 -1.62 (-0.55%) ] has raised margins three times in a week, making it more expensive for traders to place speculative bets. The latest hike raises initial margins on speculative positions in silver future by another 12% as of close of business Tuesday, May 3.

"Recent buyers will be most impacted by margin increases," says RBC precious metals analyst George Gero. "New margin requirements make silver more expensive to trade now than gold per contract for the average firm."

One clearing firm, MF Global [MF 8.225 0.065 (+0.8%) ], has already sharply exceeded the CME's requirements, boosting margins by 75% last Friday.

CPM Group, a leading precious metals research firm, said all this activity is preceding an even more dramatic drop and it forecast the metal could fall to as low as $37 an ounce in the short term.


Read more: CNBC.com

.

Honeybee said...

The silver correction may be over:

Seeking Alpha_Brian Kelly

"The 10% + plunge in silver has some asking if the rally is over while others are claiming the bubble has popped - neither view is accurate. Let's examine what really happened.

The most important piece of news on the silver market has been missed by many ... that is the decision by Bolivia NOT to nationalize its mines. While margin increases by the CME (CME), MF Global (MF), and Think or Swim likely exacerbated the sell-off, it was not the cause of the decline.

Since the strike at the San Cristobal mine (third largest silver mine in the world) and the subsequent threat by Bolivian President Morales to nationalize the mining industry, silver has climbed over 30%. To put this in perspective, at this pace silver would reach $100 /oz. by the end of the year. There are not many certainties in investing, but one thing is for sure ... trees do not grow to the sky!

In any bull market a little pullback is welcome -more importantly, a large pullback and subsequent rebound is a gift. Over the weekend, Bolivia announced that it would not fully nationalize mines, but may require increased royalty payments. This news will likely be a major positive for Coeur de'Adlene (CDE). The surprise announcement was the perfect excuse for traders to punch a few sell tickets. However, nothing has changed fundamentally in the silver market."



The Silver Correction Is Over, Next Stop $62

.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
birdbrain said...

To: Barney Frank Wants to Strip Bank Presidents

Given his background this may indeed be true, but please remember this is a family-friendly blog

Honeybee said...

Birdbrain,

Indeed you are correct. Thank you for pointing out the double-entendre message by anonymous about Barney Frank.

I will delete it and post a link to the article:

Marketwatch: Frank Targets Fed Hawks

.

Dan G said...

The market appears vulnerable to a drop to the previous high around 12,500, as it's quite overbought as per the chart of DJIA. I will attempt a logical link, but no promises!

Overbought Dow

Honeybee said...

Silver is getting crushed. Makes one wonder what is really going on.

Mark Thomas of Seeking Alpha claims the silver bull market is over. I don't necessarily agree with him, but the silver down-draft gives him an opportunity to write an article he wasn't writing at the top:

Silver Bull Market is Over

.

Honeybee said...

note to "anonymous"...Convince me you aren't the person who is attacking Kirk and me on another board if you ever again want to participate here.

You have given away the fact that you sit on this blog day and night.

.

Anonymous said...

is SLV a good buy here at 35.41???

Honeybee said...

Anyone get the number of that truck that hit silver? They just keep raising margin requirements. Plus the unemployment numbers grew instead of dropping as expected:

Morning Gold & Silver Market Report – 5/5/2011
by Peter LaTona May 5, 2011

JOBS REPORT = MORE BAD NEWS FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY – The number of US claims for unemployment was expected to drop 19,000 this week, but instead rose by 43,000 to 474,000. This is the highest level in eight months. The four-week moving average for jobless claims, considered the better trend measurement, rose 22,250 and is now over 400,000 to 431,250…the highest since November.

The CME Group announced late Wednesday, that they are raising silver margin requirements for the 4th time in two weeks. These hikes are an effort to manage risks and this quick 84% increase is shaking speculators out of the market. The price of silver has dropped sharply, but is expected to level on the view of the long term investor.

Read more at APMEX

.

Honeybee said...

anonymous asked: "is SLV a good buy here at 35.41???"

I don't know. Is QQQ a good buy at $58, or should we wait until it gets back to $83 where it was a decade ago when Bob Brinker was touting it as an immediate buy?

.

Honeybee said...

So what happened to silver and what does the future hold. I can't argue with anything in this article except to point out that if you don't panic out, the "big boys" don't win:


WND Exclusive MANGRU ON MONEY
The ins and outs of 'silver selloff' explained

Exclusive: Dan Mangru reveals why small-timers are crushed and big boys win

It sounds so harsh. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

Almost makes you want to go out and register as a Democrat. That way we can redistribute some of this wealth as our current president would like.

But the current silver market is a classic case of irrational individual investors driving up the price of the market, only to have sophisticated institutions leave them holding the bag.

Well how did this happen and what happens to the silver markets from here?

The silver rally goes back to the bailouts of late 2008. After $700 billion of TARP, billions more to save the auto industry, and the election of Barack Obama, it became very clear that the U.S. was in the mood to print cheap money.

Sign up here to get the latest from Dan Mangru delivered directly to your inbox, FREE!

After reaching a low of $8.79, silver began to slowly rally. First it rallied due to Ben Bernanke almost tripling the monetary base. Then it rallied due to the $860 billion Obama stimulus. Then it continued to rally after Obama became the first president in United States history to rack up a yearly deficit in excess of $1 trillion.

Before we knew it silver was trading in excess of $30 per ounce.

Wow. What a move.

After going up some 400 percent individual investors started to take notice. Then as the U.S. markets started to sputter, Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve instituted something called Quantitative Easing 2 or simply QE2.

QE2 has the net effect of placing more U.S. dollars into the financial system and ultimately into circulation.

When more dollars are placed into the market without the necessary demand, inflation happens.

BINGO.

This was the impetus that individual investors needed to get in the game. Silver again started to skyrocket.

Then came news that Bernanke didn't plan to stop QE2 by this June and planned to take it further.

Blastoff.

We now saw silver hit intraday highs in excess of $49, a sign of major speculation and irrational exuberance.

You see in silver markets, many individual investors are leveraged buyers of the metal. What that means is they take a loan out to buy more silver than the money they have in deposit.

While some individual investors use a smart amount of leverage, many times they are tricked into borrowing anywhere between 4-8 times their money.

Case in point, if you had $10,000 cash in your account, you could buy let's say $50,000 worth of silver borrowing at 5:1 or five times the amount of money you have in the account, for a total borrowed amount of $40,000.

Utilizing margin is supposed to maximize your profit, but when used unwisely, it maximizes your risk.

If you bought silver between $47-49 with this type of margin, your overall account value would be in the area of $37,000-$39,000 (depending on fees, costs, etc.).

That means that you have lost all of your original $10,000 and you are now liable for the difference between your account value, in this case $37,000-$39,000, and your loan value, which in this example is $40,000.

Had you just bought $10,000 worth of silver, your account would be down to about $7,500-8,000 but you would still have positive equity. With unsafe leverage in our example above, you end up owing between $1,000-$3,000. This is known as a margin call.

From $8k to owing up to $3k. That's a very big swing.

Continued next post....

Honeybee said...

Continued from above:

Now getting back to overall markets. Realizing that leverage and speculation were driving prices higher, the CME Group (which is the owner of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange) hiked margin requirements three times since the beginning of last week.

This caused firms to tighten up their leverage and some firms even made stricter requirements than the CME Group.

The reduction in the amount of leverage that can be used caused selling pressure to increase last week which brought silver down to $45 an ounce after trading higher than $49 per ounce just days before.

Then add on top of this a once in a lifetime event (literally), with the death of Osama bin Laden. This sent silver prices, which rallied back to $48.22, down to $42 per ounce.

However, once the market absorbed the Osama factor, silver prices rose in excess of $47 off its Osama lows.

Institutions know the game. They knew that with margin requirements tightened that if they started selling they could trigger a significant selloff in silver. So they did.

As institutions were selling, individuals who were overleveraged in silver began what the term "margin call" means. As the price went down, it triggered individual investors to sell their positions in order to cover their investment amounts. This drove down the price of silver even further.

Add on top of this hedge fund gurus like George Soros indicating that he will start to liquidate his long gold and silver positions, and the down market can take on a life of its own.

As the market continues to go down further, shaking out most individual investors, we will start to see institutions re-enter the game, buying back in the $30s the same metals that they sold in the $40s.

You see even the institutions that are just getting out now (in the low $40s to high $30s range) aren't concerned because they've been buying silver since it was trading in the $15-20 range.

So to them all they lost was just a couple bucks of profit.

But the opportunity to take silver from $49 to let's say $36 just to buy it back again and ride it all the way to $50, that's a score.

For silver buyers out there, key adages provide the proper insight into these markets.

The first adage to follow is to remember history. Historically, gold trades at a 16 times premium to silver. These days that ratio is at 38 (meaning the price of gold is 38 times the price of silver.

Although margin requirements on silver are now more onerous than those on gold, the underlying fundamentals and price ratios for silver make it very attractive.

Secondly, individual investors in silver should be long-term players, not short-term flippers.

Silver is a dangerous metal. It can go up and down as much as 20 percent in just a couple of days. We've seen that before. We've seen it now. And we will certainly see it again.

If you are a long-term player you can afford to sit out these short-term hiccups and just focus on the long term fundamentals. The U.S. dollar is heading down, emerging markets are consuming more, and the demand for silver (industrial, inflation-hedge, and luxury) is increasing.

Just look at U.S. debt. We have $14 trillion in unfunded Social Security liabilities, $77 trillion in unfunded Medicare liabilities, and $19 trillion in unfunded prescription drug liabilities.

That's $110 trillion new dollars that we have to print just to cover our existing liabilities. God forbid that President Obama figures out a new way to start spending even more money.

So when you want to know where the price of silver is going, I'm going to give you the same answer that Steve Forbes gave me today while we talked at Starbucks, "Just follow Ben Bernanke."

Because as Bernanke gets the orders to print the dollars to pay the bills, silver will go up and up and up.

Read more: Why small-timers are crushed and big boys win http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=295069#ixzz1LUnEhJml

Honeybee said...

Link to article at WND

.

Anonymous said...

i've had good luck with INTC, T, CVX and PFE in the past year or so. All blue chip with nice dividends too! QQQ should do fine since mkt seems to be in an uptrend thru yr end at least.

Anonymous said...

Sorry to interrupt your regular programming...does anyone known a strongly Republican area of FL with low property taxes? I know Jacksonville is fairly low in property taxes, but it is too liberal for my liking.

Honey, if you do not want this posted, feel free to delete it. It will not hurt my feelings. This is sort of forum abuse but I figured someone here might know.

tfb

Anonymous said...

Third floor, going down!


SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Gold futures settled under $1,500 an ounce Thursday, the fourth day of heavy selling in metals after margin requirement increases for silver ignited a selloff for precious metals and other commodities. Gold for June delivery /quotes/comstock/21e!f:gc\m11 GCM11 -2.45% retreated $33.90, or 2.2%, to settle at $1,481.40 an ounce on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange. Silver for July delivery /quotes/comstock/21e!f1:si\n11 SIN11 -8.89% has not yet settled; it most recently traded 8.5% lower at $36.13 an ounce.

Anonymous said...

anonymous asked: "is SLV a good buy here at 35.41???"

I don't know. Is QQQ a good buy at $58, or should we wait until it gets back to $83 where it was a decade ago when Bob Brinker was touting it as an immediate buy?

Bashing Brinker's QQQ call has nothing to do with silver but if you feel better go for it.

Pretty amateurish.

Honeybee said...

anonymous said: "Pretty amateurish."

Well I'm not a professional and I don't sell advice. Like DanG has pointed out many times, I only post my opinions.

However, your comparing me with Bob Brinker is really funny. If you are who I think you are, you've always been a joker. Problem is, jokes are only funny to you if they cause pain for someone else. Even Dija enjoyed your humor, which surprised me.

Let's get this straight: Bob Brinker has made $millions selling advice that is more wrong than it is right.

And he keeps doing it because his performance record leaves out the bad advice. Plus, he has the microphone and weekly dispenses information about himself that is less than candid and some say is downright dishonest.

.

Anonymous said...

maybe SLV is a better buy here at $33.54?? Just a QQQuestion?? :)

Dan G said...

The Dow is getting close to that 12,500 support area as previously discussed. And it's VERY oversold. Could be time to start buying if you have any cash...IMHO, of course.

As for SLV, there is support at around 30, but it has dropped like a rock on very high volume. I'd be hesitant to try to catch that falling knife, but if I did, I might try it with a small position at first, and with the realization that I'd have a good chance of being stopped out.

- Dan G

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
"Sorry to interrupt your regular programming...does anyone known a strongly Republican area of FL with low property taxes?"

I know an area of Tallahassee that might be just the spot for you. The area is totally integrated but not many vote so I think it's probably more conservative.

Property taxes are low so the schools are second rate too but I know a spot that's only a few doors down from Chuck-E-Cheese so you could walk to work.

Let me know if you're interested.

Olad

Anonymous said...

I get the consistent insulting tone, but what I have never figured out is why you think it is insulting for someone to work at or to own a pizzeria?

tfb

Anonymous said...

Okay stalker type dude….

I took the liberty of copying your post and a couple of others to a clinical psychiatrist who happens to do talk shows and gave her a call. Here is her analysis that I paraphrased:

Your idea of debasement to others is predicated upon an inferiority complex that manifested itself through others dominance of you in your childhood. One possibility is your mother either abandoned you or left early and you have unresolved mother figure issues. Anything that challenges your view of the world triggers a momma episode, and you feel momentarily powerless, as you did when momma went bye-bye. As a result you lash out at others who challenge your presumed domain as any challenged triggers your mother concept and like any underdeveloped child you lash out.

The other possibility is you were sexually abused by others of the same gender in an authoritative position over you. Therefore you ascribe to others, you see in subservient or low tier positions the hatred of self you manifested for allowing yourself to be repeatedly debased. Your ego will not let you realize it is your own weakness that you despise so you project it on others.

So there you go, either you did not get to suck momma’s teat long enough or you were sucking something else…sounds about right to me.

Love ya big guy...

tfb

Anonymous said...

Holding TIPS will make you poorer
Commentary: Millions hold an investment guaranteed to lose money


BOSTON (MarketWatch) — Would you buy an investment that was absolutely guaranteed to lose money?


No ifs, ands or buts: This sucker will make you poorer! How’s that sound?

You might think this is a crazy question. You’re probably thinking, who would choose to own an investment that is guaranteed to lose money?

The answer is lots of people. Millions. And most of them have no idea what’s happening.

You may be among them.

You wouldn’t believe what’s going on in the bond market right now. If I hadn’t seen it with my own eyes, I wouldn’t either.

I’m talking about short-term Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, known as TIPS. These are U.S. government bonds that are increasingly popular with investors. They offer a guaranteed rate of return on top of the official inflation rate."

No COLA Senior

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tips-the-latest-big-steal-2011-05-06?link=home_carousel

Dan G said...

Like clockwork, the Dow bounced off its 12,500 (ok, the low was actually 12,521) support yesterday and closed above it (12,584).

And Brinker says charts don't work. Well Brinker may be an honorable man, but from time to time, I tend to disagree with him!

Pig said...

I took the liberty of copying your post and a couple of others to a clinical psychiatrist who happens to do talk shows and gave her a call.

That CONFIRMS it for me. I KNOW exactly who it is now.

The answer is even embedded in your post.

Honeybee said...

Sunday on Moneytalk, Bob Brinker talked about the fact that he has sold all of the Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities (VIPSX) in Marketimer portfolios. He said that the rates were too low now.

Another move that Brinker made in January was to lower the weighting of Vanguard Ginnie Mae Fund (VFIIX). Now in May, he has lowered that weighting once more in his "income portfolio." That portfolio now contains only 15% Ginnie Mae Fund.

He also lowered the Vanguard Short-Term Investment Grade (VFSTX) from 25% to 15%.

Looks like this Marketwatch article agrees with Brinker. Others do not agree with Brinker.

Holding TIPS will make you poorer

.

Honeybee said...

DanG said: "Like clockwork, the Dow bounced off its 12,500 (ok, the low was actually 12,521) support yesterday and closed above it (12,584)."


Awww....TA is often a thing of beauty. :)

.

Anonymous said...

"I took the liberty of copying your post and a couple of others to a clinical psychiatrist who happens to do talk shows and gave her a call."

LOL! Does she do talk shows on a 4-watt station in a used car lot?

The nice thing about being a pizza twirler is that you can move just about anyplace and get a job.

One step below McDonalds in the skill department.

Anybody who would move to another location because of lower property taxes can't afford the taxes anyway.

At Chuck-E-Cheese you get tip sharing benefits. Don't forget that.

Dan G said...

"TA is often a thing of beauty."

Well, I certainly think so.

But alas, Brinker says NO! At least not charts. But Bob...they work!

Honeybee said...

anonymous...I'm going to ask you again to please choose a handle, stick to one, and use it. I'm sure many readers find it confusing when there is no identifying signature on posts here.

Please be aware that you are reaching the end of your rope here and may hang yourself if you don't show some respect for me and others.

You said: "Anybody who would move to another location because of lower property taxes can't afford the taxes anyway."

You have an intense dislike for people who don't like having pockets picked by the government tax-suckers. I wonder what kind of public trough you are feeding at that you want to protect.

Also, are you aware that Bob Brinker moved into no-state tax states? Think he did it to avoid paying state tax? I do. He harps on the subject all the time.

.

Pig said...

Please be aware that you are reaching the end of your rope here and may hang yourself if you don't show some respect for me and others.

This is just my opinion that you didn't ask for, but is this remark a few years old?

If not.......it should be..............

Boot the POS. Nobody will play with him at the sewer. Why humor him here?

Honeybee said...

Mr. Pig,

DONE!

Now he will continue sending filth and hate from the depths of his very sick mind, but at least my friends here don't have to read it.


.

Honeybee said...

Mr Pig, et al,

One more thing, I honestly had hoped that if I gave this "anonymous" person a chance to contribute to the blog and give his own opinions, that he might by some miracle rise above his mysterious venom.

It didn't work, but I went way beyond what any reasonable person would have under similar circumstances. It won't happen anymore...

I would be happy if he just unbookmarked the blog and stopped stalking me other places.

.

Pig said...

Ms Honey says, " Now he will continue sending filth and hate from the depths of his very sick mind, but at least my friends here don't have to read it."

Just email it to them. Why cheat them out of listening to the freak foam at HEr mouth.

One more thing, I honestly had hoped that if I gave this "anonymous" person a chance to contribute to the blog and give his own opinions, that he might by some miracle rise above his mysterious venom.

Allow me to remind you that 2 dopey people gave him the same chance at another Google site, and all he did was spread more lies and filth until some genius booted him from there, and never regretted it.

I would guess that the same thing happened at 101.

3 strikes and screw him. Let him go back to his glorious BOT Brothers and Sisters.

Honeybee said...

Note to friends who want to contribute to the conversation here, please remember to sign your posts.

I have no choice but to censor anonymous posts that don't have signatures so as not to encourage or play stupid games with this filthy-minded jealous moron - and possibly dangerous stalker.

.

Anonymous said...

Amen to that, HB.

No shoes, no shirt, no service.

No name, no post, no exceptions.

-- Frankj

Pig said...

play stupid games with this filthy-minded jealous moron - and possibly dangerous stalker.

May I also remind people that this freak of nature likes to imp and post with ID's that belong to other people.

So......if a post looks atypical, it could be this sissy playing his imp games.

Anonymous said...

I will just be happy when all this talke to and about anonymous posters goes away.

It just messes up the board with all the posts you have to skip over.

I don't know about others but I have to post with an anonymous.

JamesB

Honeybee said...

JamesB,

I agree, and the subject is closed.

And I know that several have to post with anonymous (thanks Google-not), so that is why I continue to allow the option. However, it's simple to sign posts.

.

Honeybee said...

Technical Analysis that applies to Silver:

Safehaven - Watching Silver

.

Honeybee said...

Bob Brinker's son said: : "3000 followers today - thank you all for that!"

Twitter.com BobBrinker


Honeysbuzz Twitted:

"Shamelessly capitalizing on famous father's name works well for him."

Very few people have 3000 followers. What is it about a failed computer technician living in Littleton, Colorado writing an bond newsletter that attracts so many followers?
.

Anonymous said...

What is it about a failed computer technician

Wow, I cannot believe I am going to defend Blinky...but...

A few questions, was he a computer technician, a software engineer type, or an Internet wonk? Does anyone know.

Secondly, do we know he failed? It seems to me he moved out of field with a very low quality of life and dismal long term prospects into a a field where his time is his own and his earning prospects are substantially higher.

I would be interested to know if he made his own career choice or listened to that egotistical fool he has as a presume father. The more I think about it the more I wonder whom fed whom the line of bull and failed to do any research? I mean did Da Brink listen to Blinky or did Blinky listen to Da Brink? No matter what though, both showed almost zero understanding on the Internet, globalization and economics. Given what Da Brink supposedly does for a living, it is rather scary how totally divorced he was from market forces and IT prospects.

I bet Kirk saw this coming.

Just a few thoughts,

tfb

Dan G said...

I don't know how good a computer technician Bob Jr. was, but he sure knew how to build a good message center for his Dad. Very shophisticated procedures, including searching ability in both directions.

Unfortunately he was also pretty good at censorship, though Brinkerbots were constantly finding ways around it. For example, ince "Suite 101" was not allowed, some would write "Sweet one-oh-one", which made it through.

As for his newsletter, I have no idea how good/bad it is since I've never subscribed to it. But if he's got 3,000 subscribers, he's doing pretty well. At, say $100 a year, he'd be grossing $300,000. Expenses (printing, postage, etc.) would take some away from that, but still it's a pretty good living if you ask me.

- Dan G

Notes



Subscribe to this group:

Add to Google