STOCK MARKET....Another stock market "Ground Hog Day" with Brinker reciting the Friday closing numbers. Brinker told a caller: "I disagree with what your friend said about the market just goes up and up. That's not even vaguely true. The S&P is lower now than it was back at the end of the 1990's. The end of 1999, the S&P was higher than it is right now. So the idea that the market just continues to go up is a silly bit of misinformation that your friend gave you."
Honey EC: Brinker is correct. The S&P 500 Index closed December 31, 1999 at 1469, and closed last Friday at 1333.TREASURY RATES.... Another Brinker Ground Hog Day repetition of Treasury Rates. (For latest rates, see the right column under "Items of Interest")
* From there, it went into a bear market and bottomed in March 2003 at 801. Brinker partially sidestepped that bear by raising 65% cash in his model portfolios between 2000 and 2003 (a portion of that cash was used for his QQQ trade, but never officially accounted for).
* Then the S&P began another bull run to an October, 2007 top of 1565. Brinker remained fully invested.
* From there, the S&P dropped to another low of 677 in March of 2009. Brinker remained fully invested the whole megabear.
* Now once again, the S&P is back up to 1333, but still more than 200 points below it's all-time-high of 1565. And as Brinker said, over 139 points below December 1999.
INFLATION....The Treasury market implied inflation rate = 2.38% annual. Brinker said: "Those who are looking for rapid inflation are getting tired....."
ECONOMY...Growing slowly...Next week, revised GDP expected to be at 2.2%
HOUSING MARKET: "...is on life support."
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE GOVERNMENT SHUTS DOWN? Brinker said: "We had an actual government shutdown...in the mid-90's and the market kind of yawned. It wasn't very impressed. The market correctly made the assumption that the government would re-open after a short period - which it did. I think that investors today, in general, are making the assumption that the debt ceiling will eventually be raised and then we can get down to the serious business of trying to get toward a balanced budget, which is a very important subject, and the one that Washington should be focused on going forward."
WHAT IF THE TREASURY DEFAULTS ON DEBT? Brinker said: "I will say this, if the United States defaults on its debt, I can't give you any reason why anybody in the world should lend a penny to the United States Treasury.....If they actually do that, I can't give you any reason why anybody should invest in a US Treasury......Personally, I don't see how they can go into default because they're constantly going into the market and borrowing more money. If they go into default, they will access to additional borrowing. How are they going to fund a trillion dollar a year, plus, deficit, if they can't go into the market and sell debt. How would they do that? How could they possibly face the risk that they would be unable to sell Treasury debt because they were in default.....I don't see that as a realistic outcome."
WILL THEY RAISE TAXES... Brinker said: "I certainly expect to see a continuation of political pressure on raising the rate on the high earners, which are defined for a single person as those making over $200,000. For married couples, those making over $250,000 in taxable income. .....Will they go beyond that?...... That one is going to be fascinating to watch because they have a gargantuan gap between expenditures and revenues right now. And they are going to have to deal with that. A lot this is lodged in Medicare. I mentioned that we have a 110 trillion dollar unfunded liability in Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. But most of that is Medicare. Medicare is a fantastic deal for those getting benefits. Medicare is a disastrous deal for the Federal Government because it is running the national deficit and the national debt to the moon."
CALIFORNIA BEING RIPPED OFF BY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES......In the opening segment of hour two, Brinker talked at length about California, and he itemized several outrageous public employees' salaries and pensions in various places in the state. Brinker pointed out that in regard to public employees (and their unions), "no one is minding the store" -- while in the private sector, usually someone is at least counting the money.
Honey EC: As I said above, Brinker never mentioned Arnold Schwarzenegger today. Although in the past, Brinker has said that Arnold Schwarzenegger was "good for California' and vigorously defended him. One time, Brinker went so far as to say that he gets “ill” when he hears people "bash Arnie."
Perhaps there's a reason for his reluctance to say anything about Arnie's lying, cheating and adultery. But what about the possibly irreparable damage that "Arnie" did to California? He was elected because voters believed what he said he would do for the state -- HE LIED! And shame on you, Bob Brinker, for not mentioning the disgusting behavior of this two-term governor of California, who got elected while he AND his wife lied to voters... You bash California every week, but give your buddy a pass? It's a shameful thing to do, just like what Arnold Schwarzenegger did was shameful.
Brinker's guest-speaker was Andrew Ross Sorkin, who wrote "Too Big to Fail." The HBO movie is scheduled to debut tomorrow at 9PM eastern time.
Brinker started the interview by asking Sorkin what he would like to add to his book since it was completed a year ago. Sorkin pointed out that the book was actually completed in 2009 - that Brinker was looking at the paperback date.
Sorkin said: "Very little has changed. We now live in a world that is too big to fail squared. The top ten banking institutions in this country now control 77% of all the banks assets. Think about that concentration and what that actually means. We have not solved the too big to fail conundrum, and that to me, is the most disheartening part about this crisis. But the other thing that I think it's really important that we focus on, given that we talked about debt and the risk and what that means, is that the conversation about this phrase too big to fail no longer just applies to banks. We are now talking about in the context of municipalities and states and countries in Europe and eventually maybe our own. I think that is a much larger and more important conversation because the next financial crisis that we have, I'm not sure is going to be generated on Wall Street. I think it's generated by us. I'm not going to say there's going to be a sequel. I actually hope I don't have to write one. But if there is one, that's what this is ultimately going to be about."Brinker asked: "Is the United States Treasury too big to fail?"
Sorkin replied: "Arguably it is. And the question is who, who, who can rescue us? The only people who can rescue us is the Fed which is the lender of last resort at this point. But will they really have enough firepower? And that is what we don't know. If a really big institution, when I say big, I'm talking a JP Morgan or a Citigroup, whatever, got in trouble, are we in a position to save them and what would really happen?Brinker thanked Sorkin and again announced that the HBO film would debut tomorrow (Monday, May 23rd). The book is also available for Kindle:
Part of the legislation that was passed around financial reform was this idea that a resolution authority, the idea that you could finally have the authority to take over one of these institutions. And it will be our last line of defense. The question is, will it really work, and there's no way to practice. We won't know until we do it, and I think that has a lot of people very anxious."
Moneytalk on demand and to go with Bob Brinker, is available for FREE audio/podcasting at KGO810 radio for seven days after broadcast. I download and save all three hours, including the third hour guest-speaker. (The program is archived in the 1-4pm time-slots.) If you don't download it from KGO within seven day, it's available at bobbrinker.com by paid subscription. KGO Radio Sunday Archives
SJ Al recently sent pictures from Florida, and sent this one this morning. Al has now returned home. Hope you had a wonderful vacation -- and thanks for this picture of one of the inhabitants of Cozumel:

Dixiegeezer took this picture for us yesterday in Florida. To me, plumeria IS Hawaii. Does it smell as sweet in Florida? :)


48 comments:
After hearing the program yesterday it seemed that the use of a laugh track, strategically placed, could widen the show's appeal. I found three such instances during the first hour:
Mr B told a caller "the DJIA is an unweighted index" (insert mild chuckling) as he should know it is price-weighted with the highest priced stocks having a greater influence on index performance.
On the origin of Moneytalk-
"We started this program on the premise that if we did an honest show" (cue rolling laughter)
"This is a real program, this is not an informercial......Moneytalk on demand information is posted up on the homepage" (uproarious, hysterical laughter)
My two cents.
"Honey EC: As I said above, Brinker never mentioned Arnold Schwarzenegger today."
Why should he? California political gossip is of no interest to a nationwide investment show.
I thought it was a good program.
Bill
Also I don't think the book.."Too Big to Fail" is available on Kindle. At least I can't find it.
Bill
"Mr B told a caller "the DJIA is an unweighted index"".
Most analysts would agree with Bob's assessment of the Dow as an unweighted index. It is not capitalization weighted as the S&P index is.
From TheStree.com glossary: "Market capitalization of S&P indexes is calculated by multiplying the current price per share times the number of floating shares. Other market cap weighted indexes multiply the price by the number of outstanding shares. Market cap indexes may also be called market value indexes.
In contrast, in an unweighted index, such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), a similar price change in any of the stocks in the index has an equal impact on the changing value of the index."
He's not always right, but in my humble opinion, I think we have to give this one to Brinker.
Bob had a caller who talked about an article in the Denver post. The title is: "Hosts of some financial-advice radio shows have had issues themselves"
By David Migoya
The Denver Post
05/22/2011
(The Denver Post)Colorado's radio airwaves most weekend mornings teem with self-anointed financial experts telling you how to manage your money, when, in fact, some of them have had problems managing their own.
The personal backgrounds behind the voices of nearly a dozen financial radio program hosts are littered with little secrets that might give consumers pause before handing over their money.
The individuals, most of them local businessmen, have histories that include personal bankruptcies, federal and state income tax liens, investigations by federal and state regulators, allegations of Ponzi schemes, lawsuits by jilted clients, even the loss of a job because of questionable conduct, according to a Denver Post review of dozens of public records from a variety of agencies.
Although the radio hosts on Denver's major AM stations might have some background in the financial-services sector, many are insurance salesmen peddling one plan or another, typically annuities — regulated in Colorado as an insurance product, not a security as in several other states.
Consumers who happen across the shows also might not realize that nearly all of them are paid advertisements — pitches for listeners to call for additional information about a product or seminar they're offering.
"The concern is that what a consumer hears on the show might not be fully disclosed as to its risk," said Fred Joseph, Colorado's commissioner of securities. "Because they're on the radio or quoted somewhere, it gives them credibility. The product they're pitching has risk."
14 show hosts vetted
The Post vetted 14 radio show hosts offering financial advice or opinions on major Denver metro-area stations. Some have no professional complaints against them or personal financial issues, according to records reviewed by The Post.
For example, Bob Brinker's national ABC radio show, which airs locally Sunday mornings on KNUS (710 AM), has no discernible issues. The same goes for Chad Owen and Bret Roby's "Safe Money Radio," a locally produced show that broadcasts Sundays on KHOW (630 AM) and KKZN (760 AM).
But the others have at least one financial or professional issue that consumers might want to know about.
Bill
I believe the Kindle version of "Too Big Fail" is available at Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/Too-Big-Fail-Inside-ebook/dp/B002VNFNZ6
Birdbrain,
I laughed out loud when reading your post because I thought the same as you on every point.
Even though I chose not to cover the call about the Denver Post article, a Florida friend and I discussed it after the program. We both agreed that Brinker's "informercial" high-horse was hysterical -- especially (as you said) because it was soon followed by him touting "Moneytalk on Demand."
The question is, does he pay for those ads?
Another interesting point on this subject. That call was in the first hour of the program and almost on cue, and for the first time in a very long time, Brinker never mentioned any of his portfolios at all throughout the program.
Was he thinking that might just be a little too obvious even for his naive free-loading listeners?
.
Thanks jeff,
But I get this message for the Kindle edition:
"This title is not available for customers from: United States
Shop titles available for United States"
Have you downloaded a Kindle edition of the book?
Bill
Bill wants to know why Brinker "should" have mentioned the Arnold Schwarzenegger scandal.
Well, Bill, perhaps you didn't read the part of my summary where I laid out the reasons:
1. Brinker bashes California every week, claiming that it has a "dysfunctional government." Schwarzenegger spent 8 years in Sacramento being dysfunctional, and now we know he was a liar from day one.
Ya think that might be something an honest man would find repulsive? Hmmm?
2. Brinker has spoken of Schwarzenegger in the past, defended him and sung his praises. Brinker even went so far as to say it made him "ILL" when people talked about him negatively.
Now Bill, I have a question for you:
How much of the program would Brinker have spent on this kind of disgusting behavior if it was Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachman or George Bush?
.
It appears that the Kindle edition of "Too Big to Fail" is available. Later today, I will buy it to find out for sure:
Amazon.com
.
"How much of the program would Brinker have spent on this kind of disgusting behavior if it was Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachman or George Bush?"
Nobody can answer a rhetorical question like that of course.
HB said..."Schwarzenegger spent 8 years in Sacramento being dysfunctional..."
I submit that California hasn't had a functional governor for at least three generations.
It's mainly the fault of the obstructionist Republicans in the assembly IMO.
But then you would probably not agree with that.
Anyway Brinker's show is not a political show nor is it supposed to be.
Bill
OK, thanks for that link to the Kindle edition of "Too Big Too Fail" That will work. I couldn't find that link.
Thanks.
Bill
Jeffchristie,
Thanks...That is the article that the caller talked about, which sent Brinker into his speech about how so many money programs are "infomercials." It was beyond funny, it was mind-boggling.
As far as the article's author claiming that Bob Brinker has no "issues," what rock has he been living under for the past 20 years?
Certainly, Brinker hasn't been accused of anything illegal, but everything in the world of money that is legal, is not necessarily moral.
.
Bill said: "It's mainly the fault of the obstructionist Republicans in the assembly IMO."
Yes, that clearly is your opinion, nothing else.
Bill said: "Anyway Brinker's show is not a political show nor is it supposed to be."
How long have you been listening to Moneytalk? Two weekends?
Brinker spends a whole lot more time talking politics than he does talking about the markets.
The only subjects that comes close to politics are his "model portfolios."
Can you say, "informercial." LOL!!
.
Here is a post from a new listener to Moneytalk. He seemed to think it was an infomercial.
LIradiofan226
Phil Boyce needs to fire weak link Bob Brinker!
« on: April 26, 2008, 06:47:58 PM »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've noticed that 770 has a strong lineup of top-notch people and programs even on the weekend. Mark Simone, Larry Kudlow, Monica Crowley, Eric Hastings with the Travel Show, John Batchelor and Bill Cunningham are all firm credible entertaining programs with substance. Why then on Saturday and Sunday afternoons do they waste time with a tedious nonsensical infomercial by some guy Brinker. Especially on Saturdays after Monica Crowley Phil Boyce should try to find some informative relevant program to fill the two-hour gap before Saturday Night Oldies than rely on a paid infomercial with Bob Brinker. That's just my opinion. I say recruit Andrew Willcow back for two hours on Saturday or give the slot to Jeffrey Lichtman who always does a reliable job whether he's subbing for Sliwa or Kudlow. Just for heavens sake get rid of that buffoon Brinker Phil and hire someone you can be proud of.
Looks like bob is changing his image. He is now a U2 fan.
LOL
I am trying to imagine him in the crowd with his dark glasses and u2 shirt. lol
pete
Pete,
You are correct. I forgot to mention that Brinker waxed on about the Denver Mile-High U2 concert he had attended on May 21st.
Did you get the feeling, from the way he talked, that he had some kind of VIP treatment at the concert?
One caller who was just passing through Denver, talked about being caught in the traffic jam.
Brinker made it sound like he was never part of any traffic or waiting in lines with the peons.
What do you think? Did he get a special invitation from one of his much-admired ruling class?
.
His VIP treatment has been rescinded. He lives like the rest of us now since he bought the property in nevada. LOL
Pete
Anonymous wrote: I submit that California hasn't had a functional governor for at least three generations.
> It's mainly the fault of the obstructionist Republicans in the assembly IMO.
The trouble with California is there is not enough rich people left to steal nearly 10% of salary and 10% of what they buy via sales taxes to support the influx of low skilled people who make low wages but have many kids that need education and often themselves get health care from the ER.
Many of the good paying jobs and rich folk left CA for Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Idaho, Arizona and Texas. Technology jobs from Intel and other semiconductor firms started leaving long ago.
Hollywood left CA to produce movies and TV shows in lower cost Canada. There is a good show about a cute lawyer in SF that is produced in Vancouver to save on the SF City tax plus gargantuan CA taxes. ALL other shows left SF long ago due to excessive extraction of wealth from the productive.
The democrats in CA get their lessons on how to run the state from Greece.
Honeybee, I thought you were not allowing this anonymous man of a thousand aliases and too much time on his hands to post any more. His nonsense gives him away every time.
Birdbrain: you are on the mark to pounce on the infomercial comment. That's why HB and I want you as the spokesman for our Bulb/Bag Timer newsletter.
California: what role have ballot initiatives played, both statewide and local?
U2: Well, I guess better them than finding out BB is a big fan of the band, Cheap Trick.
While in Ireland, is our president asking about their plan to tax the capital value of pension plans by 0.6% per year?
Frankj
I heard BB on Sunday for the first time in 5 years. He sounded so droopy, I thought I was listening to the insomnia-producing George Noory.
BB did give good advice to the young man from Alaska whose aunt was gifting him a large sum of money. I was disappointed that Brinker did not comment on the kindness of the aunt to gift an inheritance before her death. Lots of young families need help these days.
Plumeria is know to me as frangipani.
Hi Smudge,
My goodness, five years is a long time not to listen to Brinker. Yes, sometimes he sounds very excited and other times he sounds subdued - strange.
As you said, Brinker gave very good advice to the man from Alaska -- his name was Eddie. His mother was going to give him an $80,000 gift.
He seemed to have a family, job and home, so probably the mom just wanted to give him a leg up. It would have been nice if Brinker had pointed out that it was a very generous thing to do.....
Brinker advised him to pay off a credit card balance on a card that was charging 12% interest -- and told him to make a pledge to pay off the balance in full each month.
Brinker also advised him not to pay off his home loan...If I recall correctly it was about 4 1/4%, which Brinker said was a good rate.
Brinker also told him to set up an emergency stash of money in liquid, short-term, high-quality securities.
Brinker told him not to pay off his car loan because it was very likely that it fit under the interest rule of 78.... IOW: most of the interest had been paid up front.
And finally, Brinker advised him to set up Roth IRAs for both himself and his wife.
That was all very good basic financial advice, which Brinker does well when he's not trying to sell investment letters. :)
.
Oh and Smudge, about plumeria = frangipani:
I'm sure it smells as sweet. :)
.
To Frankj:
Though in the early stages of considering your employment offer as BBT spokesman, I can declare three conditions that must be satisfied.
a) Corner office
b) Expense account at Wendy's
c) Lifetime subscriptions to both Marketimer and Fixed Income Advisor
The aforementioned terms are non-negotiable. My people will contact your people.
He could be the WINNER !!!
So, Karl Rove is against CAIN?
Rove wants one of the GOP insiders to be the nominee
Such as Bob Dole
Such as John McCain
Nothing new
Let me try to quote Cain
Washington is FULL of politicians . . . how is that working out for you?
fig
http://dailycaller.com/2011/05/23/rove-o....-next-huckabee/
Birdbrain:
Done.
As for the office, just pick any suitable room in your house or trailer. Please don't work out of your basement though, image is important in the advice peddling business, HB and I want the business to appear very "hip."
(I think that's the word ...)
Frankj
Fig,
Your link doesn't work, but if you are trying to say you like Herman Cain, I agree.
I want to hear more from him. So far, I have agreed with everything he has said.
.
Great summary as usual HB!
WHAT IF THE TREASURY DEFAULTS ON DEBT? Brinker said: "I will say this, if the United States defaults on its debt, I can't give you any reason why anybody in the world should lend a penny to the United States Treasury.....If they actually do that, I can't give you any reason why anybody should invest in a US Treasury.
Jim Rogers, the man who correctly predicted the boom in commodities and told Maria B on TV years ago to buy farm land in the US could give Brinker some reasons. (I am NOT saying if I agree or disagree here, just reporting facts.)
From Here's why Jim Rogers says his timing is terrible
Published on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:00
comes to the markets, though it's hard to believe that of such a successful and inveterate investor. Still, he admits he was completely wrong about the decision that now dominates his life, to have kids....
...
Though now known primarily for his bullishness about commodities and China, he has had other investment passions. He was a champion of emerging markets in the 1980s, from Austria to Argentina to the Ivory Coast.
...
Rogers also timed the US property market almost perfectly convinced a bubble had built there. He and Parker sold their home on Riverside Drive, a deal for USD 16 million that closed in December 2007. He had bought the home in January 1977 for USD 1806,000, at a time the city teetered on bankruptcy and was at its nadir. "They were giving things away," he recalls.
...
Rogers says he is currently long on commodities and currencies, having started to buy the US dollar in the form of Treasury bills in November 2009.
....
He believes the current correction in commodities is a short-term blip in their upward run. That may have years to continue, just as the 1987 crash was a brief respite in a decade-long bull run for stocks.
"What will probably happen is that I will sell my commodities, and they'll double again, then I'll sell them short, then they'll double again because all bubbles go up farther than you expect," he says. "And then, if I don`t get wiped out, they'll fall and I'll make some money."
.....
I find Roger's honesty, compared to Brinker's radio informercial, refreshing.
Well, it looks like the formation of the new Bulb-Bag Timer-Advisor is coming right along.
In addition to the two founders and CEOs (FrankJ and Honey) we now have a Spokesman on board (Birdbrain).
Birdbrain struck a hard bargain before accepting this exalted position -- proving once again that he's not cuckoo.
However, FrankJ, wise as an owl, managed not to ruffle Birdbrain's feathers while showing him that image is everything -- not reality.
So like other popular newsletters, the Bulb/BagTimer Advisor will appear to be beautiful as a peacock and harmless as a dove -- while the vulture pecks your pockets.
The good news is, we can look forward to Birdbrain's weekly infomercial and you will never know for sure if FrankJ or Honey is the author of the latest issue.
.
I agree with those of you who said Brinker gave good advice to the man for Alaska who was going to receive an $80,000 gift from a relative. There is however one aspect of it that I have a question on. Will the gift tax come into play here? Maybe one of the tax experts who post here could answer this.
Is Brinker going to do another scare tactic with 100w light bulbs, like he did with theY2K crap?
What me Worry? I stocked up last week with 5000 hour rated Westinghouse 100W ENERGY WASTING incandescent bulbs.
For Sale cheap on Jan 2nd 2012, and no stinkin GE substitutes.
Kirk,
Thanks for the Jim Rogers update. I know that some of us here listen when he speaks. :)
.
This post is by the new Westinghouse salesPig, me. I have no idea how I got to be Anonymous.
Is Brinker going to do another scare tactic with 100w light bulbs, like he did with theY2K crap?
What me Worry? I stocked up last week with 5000 hour rated Westinghouse 100W ENERGY WASTING incandescent bulbs.
For Sale cheap on Jan 2nd 2012, and no stinkin GE substitutes.
Jeff: On the gift tax I'm no expert but to try and answer your question:
If the person giving the $80,000 gave it to one individual, then the first 13K is excluded under the "annual exclusion." The rest is reportable on Form 709 as a gift. No tax would be due, but the amounts of gifts given in excess of the annual exclusion are kept track of via this form, and the amount of those gifts is subtracted from the amount that you can exclude from your estate when you figure your estate taxes.
For 2009 (I don't have the 2010 numbers) the estate tax credit was $345,800. This would be the number you subtract from your estate before estate taxes are figured. A reported gift of 67K (80-13) would reduce this credit to 278,800.
The person giving the gift could have given each family member 13,000, but there might have been reasons why they did not want to, or maybe they didn't realize they could do it.
And if there is a REAL tax expert out there, please weigh in...
Frankj
Mr Pig asked: "Is Brinker going to do another scare tactic with 100w light bulbs, like he did with theY2K crap?"
Well, if he does, we will be prepared and issue a Bulb/Bag-Timer-Advisor Act-Immediately Special Bulletin for subscribers only.
.
CNBC Anchor Mark Haines Dies Unexpectedly at Age 65
Veteran journalist Mark Haines, a fixture on CNBC for 22 years, died unexpectedly Tuesday evening. He was 65 years old.
Haines, founding anchor of CNBC's morning show "Squawk Box," was co-anchor of the network's "Squawk on the Street" program, providing insight and commentary sometimes humorous and occasionally acerbic.
CNBC President Mark Hoffman called Haines a "building block" of the financial networks' programming. Hoffman said Haines died at his home.
"With his searing wit, profound insight and piercing interview style, he was a constant and trusted presence in business news for more than 20 years," Hoffman said in a statement to CNBC employees. "From the dotcom bubble to the tragic events of 9/11 to the depths of the financial crisis, Mark was always the unflappable pro.
"Mark loved CNBC and we loved him back. He will be deeply missed."
Haines may be best remembered for his calming and commanding presence during the 9/11 tragedy when he reacted unflapplably to the furious stream of incoming rumor and even more astonishing truth with a professionalism that rivaled any television anchor, said CNBC senior economics reporter Steve Liesman.
Haines was well-known around the newsroom for giving his colleagues on-air nicknames. He was responsible for calling David Faber "The Brain," Joe Kernen "The Kahuna" and Steve Liesman "The Professor." If a colleague every complained about it, he would respond, "What's worth more, your name or the nickname?"
He also often helped make his colleagues look good on air, saying, "Hey, when they look good, I look good, too."
Haines served as a news anchor for KYW-TV in Philadelphia, WABC-TV in New York, and WPRI-TV in Providence, before joining CNBC.
Haines held a law degree from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and was a member of the New Jersey State Bar. In 2000, he was named to Brill’s Content’s "Influence List."
Jeffchristie,
Thanks for the sad news about Mark Haines and the bio.
His CNBC peers obviously thought highly of him.
He seemed like a nice person. My condolences to his family and friends.
.
Sad news. I always found Mr Haines outspoken, entertaining, and a good reporter.
I remember watching CNBC on 9/11 as the horrific images of the WTC towers collapsing unfolded, he was briefly unable to continue on the air, so overcome with emotion. The way Bill Griffith and others treated him at that moment showed the respect and admiration they had for the man.
How interesting that Mark Haines called the market bottom almost to the minute in 2009:
"In one of his more memorable moments, he called with near precision the March 2009 stock-market bottom, saying at 9:47 a.m. on March 10, 2009, with the Dow at 6732, that he thought the bottom was in, Dave Lutz of Stifel Nicolaus writes to remind us."
WSJ Online
.
I noticed that Brinker is on more now .. even ms ON .. lynn J is not on the program for a long time..good riddence... I like brinker but at times he is boring,, and covers himself all the time...I like Ric Edleman but I don't want anyone doing my investments except me and don't want to pay for anyone one to do them ,,, yeah .. I'll stick with the Big Brinker,,, thanks honeybee
Comments deleted by the Blog Administrator are my favorite. Keep up the good work.
In 2011, the lifetime gift tax exclusion amount is $5,000,000.00 (5 million).
Smudge, you are right. When I wrote my response to Jeff, I didn't have the current numbers handy.
There is an article by Julie Garber on about.com entitled "2011 Gift Tax Exclusion - Annual Exclusion vs. Lifetime Exemption" that explains it.
Frankj
What Happened to the Great Bond Selloff?
Investing pros have been predicting a rout in bond prices for a year.
Here's why they've been wrong -- so far. ..
Those waiting for the Great Bond Selloff are starting to get antsy.
For more than a year, many market experts have argued that bonds are in a bubble, or at least very expensive. Despite that, bonds have remained popular.
This has puzzled the bearish bond gurus. In March, Pacific Investment Management Co.'s Bill Gross, the nation's largest bond manager, decided that Treasurys had gotten too pricey. He made a noisy exit from the market, proclaiming that the government's horrible balance sheet and inflationary policies (super-low interest rates, fiscal largesse, Federal Reserve bond purchases) would lead to an eventual rout in bond prices.
Since Mr. Gross's exit, bond prices have marched higher, pushing their yields, which move in the opposite direction, lower and lower....
http://www.smartmoney.com/invest/bonds/w....m_daily views_h
From Bespoke Investment Group, a great article and charts about leveraged and inverse ETF's:
"Below we highlight the best and worst performing leveraged and inverse ETFs so far in 2011. As shown, all of the ETFs on the list of best performers are 2x and 3x long ETFs, while all of the ETFs on the list of worst performers are 2x and 3x short ETFs.
On the positive side, the 2x Health Care ETF (RXL) is up the most in 2011 with a gain of 27.40%. The 3x Energy ETF (ERX) ranks second with a gain of 26.74%, followed by the 2x Silver ETF (AGQ), the 2x Oil & Gas ETF (DIG), and the 2x REIT ETF (URE). On the negative side, the 2x inverse Silver ETF (ZSL) is down the most in 2011 at -55.58%, followed by the 3x inverse Energy ETF (ERY), the 2x inverse Health Care ETF (RXD), and the 2x inverse Oil & Gas ETF (DUG) -(click charts to expand)."
Seeking Alpha
.
I have downloaded the Kindle version of "Too Big to Fail" from Amazon.com. So far, it is a very good read.
Hopefully, I will get to see it soon. I don't have HBO, but a friend sent me a taped copy.
.
Comments on comments deleted by the Blog Administrator are MY favorite. Keep up the good work.
Post a Comment